Fumfer Physics 38: Information, Quantum Fuzziness, and the Hidden Architecture of the Universe
Author(s): Scott Douglas Jacobsen
Publication (Outlet/Website): Vocal.Media
Publication Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2026/02
Scott Douglas Jacobsen revisits a long-standing idea with Rick Rosner, tracing it from an Errol Morris documentary to Rosner’s current thinking about information and cosmology. Rosner reflects on the proton–electron mass ratio as potentially non-arbitrary, speculating that it may encode something fundamental about the universe’s informational structure. He connects quantum fuzziness, mass, curvature, and collapsed matter to a broader picture in which much of the universe’s information is hidden in gravitationally dense regions tied to earlier cosmic eras. Framed explicitly as speculation, Rosner’s view treats particle precision as possibly emergent from the universe’s total informational budget.
Scott Douglas Jacobsen: I remember years ago, either before we met or when we first met—this was probably twelve years ago—I remember seeing, in the Errol Morris documentary First Person, that you mentioned how, when you had your desk-and-chair setup for thinking, you found the electron–proton mass ratio interesting with regard to the structure of the world. What do you mean by that now, after more thought, with regard to characterizing information?
Rick Rosner: I believe that quantum particles are described by wavefunctions, and that “fuzziness” (uncertainty in position and momentum, and characteristic quantum length scales) is typically tiny at everyday scales. In several important physical contexts, characteristic quantum length scales shrink as mass increases, which is one reason macroscopic objects look far less “quantum-fuzzy” than electrons do.
The proton–electron mass ratio is about 1836.152673…. My guess is that this number is not arbitrary—that, with the right mathematics, it could be derived from deeper theory rather than treated as a brute empirical input.
I believe that this ratio has something to do with the amount of information in the universe, and possibly with the amount of hidden information—probably the amount of hidden information. The age of the universe since the Big Bang is about 13.8 billion years.
Information exists in a context. The active, luminous universe includes on the order of hundreds of billions of galaxies, each with on the order of hundreds of billions of stars—often summarized as roughly 10²² stars in the observable universe—radiating enormous amounts of energy as light and other forms of radiation. If the universe is made of information, that active center consists of information that is largely consistent with the rest of the information in that active center. But there is other information in the universe that is not consistent with the current information.
It is old information contained in burnt-out galaxies on the fringes of the universe. That matter—these burnt-out galaxies—is largely gravitationally collapsed and located in a part of the universe with much greater curvature, which is also a gravitational property. We tend to think of that region as corresponding to the early universe.
When you look back, the farther away you look with a telescope, the earlier you see, because you are observing very old light that took billions of years to reach us. We think that the much more compressed, highly curved universe no longer exists in that form—that the universe, following the Big Bang, has continued to expand for about 13.8 billion years, spreading out so that the earlier tightness and curvature have diluted over time.
It looks like the surface of a balloon being inflated, except without a neck. What I am suggesting—speculatively—is that the “neck” still exists: that there is a part of the universe that remains highly curved and tightly compacted, and that all the collapsed matter in that tight region acts like tent pegs, keeping the active center of the universe open and highly defined. One possible indication of this highly defined nature of the universe might be the proton–electron mass ratio.
Now, I could be deluded or mistaken. The electron is treated in the Standard Model as a point particle. It has no known internal structure—just basic physical properties such as charge and spin. It is a point—technically a fuzzy point—but still a point. A proton, by contrast, has substantial internal structure.
It contains three valence quarks, along with gluons that mediate the strong force confining those quarks. There is a great deal happening inside every proton. So it is not as though, in a universe with no information or very little information, the mass ratio would be one-to-one.
I do think that—even if not specifically the proton–electron mass ratio, which I focused on somewhat naively—the precision with which particles in the universe are defined may be related to the total amount of information in the universe, including information hidden in collapsed matter from earlier eras of cosmic history.
Last updated May 3, 2025. These terms govern all In Sight Publishing content—past, present, and future—and supersede any prior notices. In Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons BY‑NC‑ND 4.0; © In Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen 2012–Present. All trademarks, performances, databases & branding are owned by their rights holders; no use without permission. Unauthorized copying, modification, framing or public communication is prohibited. External links are not endorsed. Cookies & tracking require consent, and data processing complies with PIPEDA & GDPR; no data from children < 13 (COPPA). Content meets WCAG 2.1 AA under the Accessible Canada Act & is preserved in open archival formats with backups. Excerpts & links require full credit & hyperlink; limited quoting under fair-dealing & fair-use. All content is informational; no liability for errors or omissions: Feedback welcome, and verified errors corrected promptly. For permissions or DMCA notices, email: scott.jacobsen2025@gmail.com. Site use is governed by BC laws; content is “as‑is,” liability limited, users indemnify us; moral, performers’ & database sui generis rights reserved.
In-Sight Publishing 