Skip to content

Anton Obozhyn on Wikipedia, Wikimedia Ukraine, and Fighting Propaganda Through Open Knowledge

2026-05-30

Author(s): Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Publication (Outlet/Website): Vocal.Media

Publication Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2026/05/08

Anton Obozhyn on Wikipedia, Wikimedia Ukraine, and Fighting Propaganda Through Open Knowledge

Photo by Planet Volumes on Unsplash

Anton Obozhyn is a Kyiv-based Ukrainian programmer, Wikipedian, and Wikimedian. A computer-science graduate working in game development, he has edited Wikimedia projects since 2014 and joined Wikimedia Ukraine in 2017. He chaired its Audit Committee from 2017 to 2020, became a board member in 2020, and has served as deputy chair since 2024. He helps organize wikimarathons, workshops, conferences, article contests, and community-support initiatives advancing free knowledge in Ukraine through volunteer-led public outreach and training.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen interviews Anton Obozhyn, a Kyiv-based programmer, Wikipedian, and Wikimedia Ukraine deputy chair, about his path from childhood encyclopedia reader to volunteer editor and organizer. Obozhyn describes discovering Wikipedia, joining Wikimedia Ukraine, supporting events and article contests, and seeing open knowledge as civic service after Euromaidan. He explains how Wikipedia’s neutral point of view, verifiability, community review, administrators, and collaborative scrutiny help resist propaganda and misinformation in Ukraine’s public sphere during wartime.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: What is your background and work in communications regarding Wikipedia?

Anton Obozhyn: I will first introduce myself and explain what we do. We handle communications related to Wikipedia. We comment on Wikipedia when topics of public interest arise, and when journalists or government bodies have questions, they turn to us.

As for how I became a Wikipedian, it started in early childhood. I stayed at my grandmother’s during the holidays and found an old Soviet encyclopedia. I began reading it and found it fascinating. I nearly memorized it.

My parents noticed this, and we went to a book market, where they bought four more encyclopedias for me.

Jacobsen: And for the record, what year were you born? That gives context as to whether you were born during the Soviet period or after Ukraine’s independence.

Obozhyn: 1995, after Ukraine became independent in 1991. That is an important distinction.

My parents bought modern encyclopedias, not Soviet ones. Later, friends gave me two more as birthday gifts, and I memorized those as well.

Eventually, I told my parents I had finished them and asked what to do next. They suggested an online encyclopedia, Wikipedia. I began reading it and found it fascinating.

I would open one article and follow links to others, three more, then more and more, until my browser could not handle it. Over time, I moved from being a reader to becoming an editor.

I began noticing things I could improve, change, or expand. As the saying goes, the greatest motivation to act is when someone is wrong on the Internet.

In 2014, during Euromaidan and the Revolution of Dignity, I looked for a way to contribute to society and to Ukraine. Editing Wikipedia became my contribution.

In 2017, I joined Wikimedia Ukraine, the Ukrainian regional chapter supporting Wikimedia projects and open knowledge. I joined because I enjoy organizing. I am skilled at planning and coordinating events. In 2020, I was elected to the board.

Jacobsen: How did it feel to join formal governance as part of the board? It looks good on a resume, but it is also meaningful when it involves something you care about and in which you have invested time.

Obozhyn: Yes, that is correct. Everyone has a hobby, something they can do that is useful for others. This became especially evident after the Revolution of Dignity, when many people embraced the idea: do not ask what your country has done for you; ask what you can do for your country.

Some people began helping those in poverty. Others organized charitable initiatives. Some improved their local communities, for example, by installing benches or making cities more accessible for people with disabilities. Others contributed by editing Wikipedia. People were looking for ways to support a shared cause, and that was my path.

That was not the only thing I did. At times, I was involved in a civil movement that aimed to counter Russian influence in Ukraine, particularly in the cultural sphere. We supported decommunization policies and advocated for greater representation of Ukrainian-language content in television and radio, which had previously been dominated by Russian-produced material. However, that is a separate topic.

I also participated in some environmental activism, though that is unrelated to Wikipedia.

Jacobsen: Regarding editors and administrators, those involved in administrative work within Wikipedia, does the system, by its structure, help combat propaganda?

Obozhyn: Yes, it does. Wikipedia’s principle is that it is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, but that does not mean people can write anything they want. There is a structured set of policies and a community that enforces them.

Key principles include a neutral point of view, verifiability, and an encyclopedic style. When someone makes an edit or creates a new article, it can be seen by many other editors, sometimes dozens, hundreds, or, for widely viewed topics, even thousands.

If there are mistakes or misleading information, someone is likely to notice. Even if many readers overlook an issue, it often takes only one attentive editor to identify and correct it. This collaborative scrutiny helps limit the persistence of misinformation.

There are also studies comparing Wikipedia’s reliability with traditional encyclopedias, indicating that its accuracy is generally comparable in many areas. This is supported by its emphasis on sourcing and verification.

The system includes different roles. Some editors review recent changes, while experienced users with additional permissions, administrators, can delete pages or block disruptive users. These checks and balances help maintain Wikipedia as a resource that people can trust.

Jacobsen: Thank you very much for the opportunity and your time, Anton.

Last updated May 3, 2025. These terms govern all In Sight Publishing content—past, present, and future—and supersede any prior notices.In Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons BY‑NC‑ND 4.0; © In Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen 2012–Present. All trademarksperformancesdatabases & branding are owned by their rights holders; no use without permission. Unauthorized copying, modification, framing or public communication is prohibited. External links are not endorsed. Cookies & tracking require consent, and data processing complies with PIPEDA & GDPR; no data from children < 13 (COPPA). Content meets WCAG 2.1 AA under the Accessible Canada Act & is preserved in open archival formats with backups. Excerpts & links require full credit & hyperlink; limited quoting under fair-dealing & fair-use. All content is informational; no liability for errors or omissions: Feedback welcome, and verified errors corrected promptly. For permissions or DMCA notices, email: scott.jacobsen2025@gmail.com. Site use is governed by BC laws; content is “as‑is,” liability limited, users indemnify us; moral, performers’ & database sui generis rights reserved.

Leave a Comment

Leave a comment