Skip to content

Beijing Platform for Action. Paragraph 151

2022-04-27

Author(s): Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Publication (Outlet/Website): The Good Men Project

Publication Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2019/09/20

151. In many regions, women’s participation in remunerated work in the formal and non-formal labour market has increased significantly and has changed during the past decade. While women continue to work in agriculture and fisheries, they have also become increasingly involved in micro, small and medium-sized enterprises and, in some cases, have become more dominant in the expanding informal sector. Due to, inter alia, difficult economic situations and a lack of bargaining power resulting from gender inequality, many women have been forced to accept low pay and poor working conditions and thus have often become preferred workers. On the other hand, women have entered the workforce increasingly by choice when they have become aware of and demanded their rights. Some have succeeded in entering and advancing in the workplace and improving their pay and working conditions. However, women have been particularly affected by the economic situation and restructuring processes, which have changed the nature of employment and, in some cases, have led to a loss of jobs, even for professional and skilled women. In addition, many women have entered the informal sector owing to the lack of other opportunities. Women’s participation and gender concerns are still largely absent from and should be integrated in the policy formulation process of the multilateral institutions that define the terms and, in cooperation with Governments, set the goals of structural adjustment programmes, loans and grants.

Beijing Declaration (1995)

Now, Paragraph 151 is a rather lengthy statement on the rights of women. It focuses on the “remunerated work” in both the “formal” and the “non-formal” labour markets in which there was, circa 1995, rapid change in their structuring and continues to be much in this direction. We’re talking about economic changes tied to some of the informal changes in society via culture. As such, we come to the idea of the “past decade” relative to 1995 and the ways in which the gender roles were beginning to take more of an alternation and switch over at the time, which became more full-swing in the 2010s continuing into 2020.

As it notes, women are working in “agriculture and fisheries” with “micro, small and medium-sized enterprises.” All of which have previously been male-dominated sectors of the economy with women spending more time in the home than anywhere else. Within this contextualization of a historical view of the remunerated work for women, there is a tacit implication on the other side of the partition. That being the ways in which women have previously been still working in sectors of the societies deemed non-remunerable. We can think of examples of childrearing and homecare.

However, as noted, the ‘significant’ changes come from significant changes in the ways in which men and women have related to one another before and now. These changes bring about reduced “gender inequality” while having more of a “bargaining power” with this improved equality of relations between men and women in “economic situations” to, in part, reduce the “difficult” financial contexts for women.

What happens when women lack such “bargaining power” for more gender equality? In turn, and as has been the historical cases, women have had to “accept lower pay and poor working conditions” because of these biases against them. These make them, in rather cold terms, “preferred workers.” These contexts not only seem but are coercive to the disproportionately women entering into them. Women should become more aware of their rights, and demand more of them, too. With knowledge of rights, and a proper fight, the advancement within the workplace can occur, especially in regards to ‘improved pay and working conditions.’

The Beijing Declaration here is arguing for labour rights with a gendered lens. Even at the time, there was a time of some job loss for women, well before the time of COVID-19. Apparently, this didn’t matter as to the profession. This happened whether “professional or skilled women.” And even if acquiring a job of some sort, women enter the “informal sector” due to lack of access or “opportunities” for other forms of employment.

Without a focus on women’s participation in the economy or in the areas of labour rights fights without gendered lens, women’s concerns regarding better pay and better working conditions can be ignored. There should be a focus on women’s capacities of potentialities for positive contributions to the formal and informal economies in the multilateral institutions, the policy formulation, the governments, and the “structural adjustment programmes, loans and grants,” as these provide a basis from which to markedly improve the accessibility of good work and opportunities for implementation of women’s rights and the advancement of gender equality.

(Updated 2020-07-07, only use the updated listing, please) Not all nations, organizations, societies, or individuals accept the proposals of the United Nations; one can find similar statements in other documents, conventions, declarations and so on, with the subsequent statements of equality or women’s rights, and the important days and campaigns devoted to the rights of women and girls too:

Documents

Strategic Aims

Celebratory Days

Guidelines and Campaigns

Women and Men Women’s Rights Campaigners

License

In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.in-sightpublishing.com.

Copyright

© Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012-Present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. All interviewees and authors co-copyright their material and may disseminate for their independent purposes.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: