Alexis Rockman on: Artwork, Science, and Environmental Storytelling Part Three

Author(s): Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Publication (Outlet/Website): Phenomenon

Publication Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2025/11/20

Jacobsen: Was there any mission in your historical past—thus far—that you’ve simply had in thoughts for an extended, very long time, however it was just too lofty or too pricey by way of effort and time? The place mid-sized tasks is perhaps—may not essentially be expedient, however they is perhaps…

Rockman: …profitable.

Jacobsen: Doubtlessly profitable—sure.

Rockman: Pay attention, I’m a small businessperson. I’ve to stability dangerous tasks that may promote someplace with issues I’m assured I’ll promote inside a comparatively cheap period of time. So, completely—and I’m always conversing with individuals about tips on how to get this stuff finished. I’ve been very fortunate, Scott, that I’ve had so many tasks that began as lofty pies within the sky and ended up changing into a actuality. However, we’re not coping with film cash right here—it’s only a portray!

Jacobsen: Proper. Now, I’ve talked to AI individuals. I had two conversations with Neil Sahota, who’s a UN advisor on AI ethics or AI security. I requested him, “How a lot of that is hype?” And he stated there’s fairly a bit, however it nonetheless must be taken critically. So, on the inventive entrance, what are your ideas on creating AI that generates visible imagery?

Rockman: I’ve a mixed-bag response to AI. On one hand, it’s dazzlingly fascinating. Then, it jogs my memory of consuming a Twinkie—it feels nice whereas doing it, after which it’s simply rubbish afterward. To me, the sky’s the restrict by way of potential. It can revolutionize the workforce—folks will lose jobs similar to each revolution. However my job is to make distinctive objects that replicate the human expertise. And AI will not be the human expertise. It mimics issues which have already been finished and reconfigures them. However there’s an odd hangover to it—irrespective of how unbelievable it appears—and so they are unbelievable—there’s one thing acquainted. It’s like a dream you’ve already had—a hangover from a dream. I’m certain AI will get higher and higher. However fortunately, I make objects. Hopefully, what’s attention-grabbing about my work is that it includes errors and reactions. Intimacy might be valued increasingly as our tradition evolves. That’s my notion.

Jacobsen: The place do you assume the place is now for artwork activists, regardless of the “despair”?

Rockman: Nicely, there are different mediums—movie, streaming, or different types of shifting leisure that come out of the historical past of tv and flicks. For instance, The China Syndrome when that got here out in 1979—crippled the nuclear business. Sadly, on reflection, environmentally, it was most likely not for one of the best. So for those who inform human tales which can be relatable it is perhaps extraordinarily efficient. However I don’t assume what I’ve finished as far as an artist has been efficient.

Jacobsen: Do you assume collective artwork activism continues to be price pursuing, reasonably than particular person?

Rockman: Nicely, I don’t know what “collective” means. What does that imply?

Jacobsen: Like artists organizing underneath banners—Earth Day, or by symposia and conferences—organized round a theme related to local weather change activism? Issues like that.

Rockman: Environmental activism has not been efficient for the reason that 1970s. Civil rights activism was efficient. Homosexual and girls’s rights have been efficient previously. The issue is that we’ve run out of time. It’s a physics experiment. It’s not negotiable.

Jacobsen: Sure, and that additionally goes again to the prior mini-commentary about how individuals, largely, aren’t physics-literate.

Rockman: Proper. However you need to perceive one thing, Scott—in America, big industrial, company, and world forces ensure persons are skeptical about science as a result of it’s of their finest curiosity. When science tells tales about industries like fossil fuels or plastics who wish to make money, they don’t wish to exit of enterprise.

Jacobsen: Sure. Not an accident. What do you assume the effectiveness of standard science communicators has been—your Invoice Nyes, your Carl Sagans, your Neil deGrasse Tysons, and others?

Rockman: I used to be fortunate, sufficiently too—effectively, I do know Neil. I do know Invoice Nye. They’re fantastic. I don’t assume they’re as fair as their duty demands. I don’t assume anybody is. We want somebody equal to Martin Luther King as a spokesperson who can tackle the mantle. That’s why the Bobby Kennedy affair is tragic—he might have been that particular person.

Jacobsen: What if we’re trying by a historic lens right here, from a generational psychology perspective? Give it some thought—throughout the peak activism period you’re referencing, there have been fewer media channels: tv and radio. A narrower distribution meant larger cohesion. Civil rights had figures like Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, and possibly Marcus Garvey as a mental legacy. Ladies’s rights had Gloria Steinem and others. These actions had leaders whom individuals needed to comply with—with enthusiasm. What if there’s been a gradual slide over a long time towards cohorts that reply much less to singular, charismatic management? If that’s the case, the ways want to vary accordingly. What about that?

Rockman: Positive. No matter works. Possibly Muhammad Ali was an excellent determine for these points, and he put his profession and life on the road. He went to jail. I don’t see… I don’t see LeBron doing that, despite the fact that he’s somebody who has, a lot to his credit score, saved himself out of controversy and lives a life price emulating on many ranges. However I don’t see anybody taking these dangers in these generations.

Jacobsen: Sure. So, is there a big, risk-averse development?

Rockman: It’s a kind of corporateness. I don’t see Vince Carter—Air Canada—doing it.

Jacobsen: Who can be the one for this era now? Whoever makes use of “Sigma” and “No Cap” finest. What’s the longest piece you’ve ever taken to supply—and what’s the quickest? I do know, sorry. I’m doing extremes right here.

Rockman: I don’t know… The sketch I did of Manifest Future on a serviette once I was at a dinner sitting subsequent to Arnold Lehman, the then director of the Brooklyn Museum in 1999, was the quickest. Then making the rattling portray took 5 years, which I completed in 2004. That was the longest. So there you go. It’s the identical piece.

Jacobsen: The official Earth Day poster for 2020 options photo voltaic panels in a vibrant pure setting. What impressed it?

Rockman: It was a tough course of, Scott, as a result of I saved developing with concepts that Earth Day deemed too destructive. And this was, in fact, earlier than the election. I used to be considering to myself, “Are you kidding me? What is that this—We Are the World or some fucking Coke industrial?” I used to be about to bail, and my spouse Dorothy stated, “Don’t be an fool. This can be a dream alternative for you.” You need to perceive that Robert Rauschenberg did the primary Earth Day poster in 1970, and my spouse used to work at Leo Castelli, the gallery that represented him. Now we have two Rauschenbergs. So, that is bucket listing. So, I talked to some mates. We devised the thought over a few beers. A lot to my shock, the Earth Day individuals preferred it. I used to be thrilled.

Jacobsen: Fast query—aspect notice. What beer?

Rockman: One of many native IPAs up right here in CT—Headway IPA.

Jacobsen: Do you ever drink Guinness?

Rockman: I’ve beloved Guinness, although it’s a little bit heavy. I had it extra once I was youthful and wanted much less strain.

Jacobsen: That’s proper—it’s for molasses aficionados or one thing like that.

Rockman: Molasses—there you go.

Jacobsen: I bear in mind one time in a small city, there was this man named Veggie Bob. I had the cellphone quantity (604) 888-1223—that’s how small the city was. He ran Veggie Bob’s. Later known as it his Growcery Café. I bear in mind I purchased a bucket of molasses from him for no good motive. What ought to I ask… How is Madagascar?

Rockman: Unhappy and unbelievable.

Jacobsen: How unhappy? How unbelievable!

Rockman: These islands have distinctive biodiversity. Who doesn’t love land leeches and delightful lemurs? Alternatively, the human inhabitants is so determined for assets. It’s like moths consuming a blanket. Then, the Chinese language attempt to eat it, too. So, it’s unhappy.

Jacobsen: You had a current Journey to Nature’s Underworld exhibition, right?

Rockman: That’s in Miami. And I even have a gallery present in Miami known as Vanishing Level on the Andrew Reed Gallery.

Jacobsen: Was the previous one with Mark Dion?

Rockman: Sure. On the Lowe Artwork Museum in Miami.

Jacobsen: How was that collaboration going?

Rockman: We’ve been mates for forty years. About twenty works every from over the past 4 a long time are juxtaposed subsequent to one another.

Jacobsen: Forty years in the past, one would possibly hazard a guess—you drank Guinness in some unspecified time in the future.

Rockman: I did, principally within the ’80s.

Jacobsen: When motion motion pictures have been a really huge factor.

Rockman: I used to be listening to a podcast about Predator—the film.

Jacobsen: Ah, sure. That’s very cool. What did you study?

Rockman: I realized so many issues. As an illustration, I realized that the primary location needed to be moved as a result of there was no jungle, and nobody might determine why that unique location had been chosen to shoot the film.

Jacobsen: Sure. That was the period of iconic film strains.

Rockman: Sure.

Jacobsen: “If it bleeds, we are able to kill it!”

Rockman: Sure.

Jacobsen: Or what was that different line… “Pussyface”?

Rockman: Was it?

Jacobsen: Good. You’re married to a journalist. What are your accomplice’s perceptions of journalism now—and her perceptions of how the general public views journalists now, based mostly in your conversations?

Rockman: My spouse Dorothy Spears slowed down being an arts journalist as a result of she felt that the issues she needed to put in writing about for the locations she was writing for grew to become more and more influenced by market dynamics. And—I don’t wish to put phrases in her mouth—and that is my notion of her notion: the marketplace for promoting in some elements of those venues started to dictate or affect the journalism content material. And she didn’t need something to do with that.

Jacobsen: That was the tip of her journalism profession?

Rockman: No, however she simply moved on to different varieties of writing. She’s writing books now—a memoir about her expertise at Leo Castelli Gallery, for instance. So, no—she simply misplaced curiosity in being on the service of the publicity division of artwork journalism.

Jacobsen: Promoting?

Rockman: Ish. It’s a really robust state of affairs.

Jacobsen: Positive. Sure. Particularly while you’re making a choice proper on the highest stage in North America.

Rockman: Precisely.

Jacobsen: That’s honest. What query have you ever all the time needed to be requested however have by no means been?

Rockman: I’m so fortunate that I’ve been requested so many questions—that anybody even cares about what I’m doing.

Jacobsen: That’d be enjoyable for those who might ask your self. What do you assume your youthful self, consuming an enormous pint of Guinness, can be asking your older self now? “Why are you consuming IPAs?”

Rockman: Ha! No, however critically—all of us have regrets. I’d give myself some recommendation at key moments: to not do sure issues and to do different issues.

Jacobsen: At what factors do seemingly good alternatives come up, however “all that glitters will not be gold”? What are some key indicators?

Rockman: You’d by no means know. Day-after-day, there’s some attention-grabbing e mail or supply. Issues typically go south, however you should be optimistic and hope one thing works out.

Jacobsen: So, this interview took a temper shift over forty minutes. I can’t inform if we went from despair to optimism or—

Rockman: Treatment or my martini kicked in.

Jacobsen: Ha!

Rockman: No, I’m kidding.

Jacobsen: That’s proper. That’s it.

Rockman: Sure.

Jacobsen: So, that’d be fairly a very good query: “Why are you consuming IPAs and martinis now reasonably than Guinness?” That’s my query to you.

Rockman: Relatively than what?

Jacobsen: Guinness into IPAs and martinis.

Rockman: You may drink extra of it with out feeling nauseated.

Jacobsen: Sure.

Jacobsen: Thanks very a lot on your time. I respect your experience.

Rockman: Pleasure.

Jacobsen: Good assembly you. Bye-bye.

Last updated May  3, 2025. These terms govern all In Sight Publishing content—past, present, and future—and supersede any prior notices.  In Sight Publishing by Scott  Douglas  Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons BY‑NC‑ND 4.0; © In Sight Publishing by Scott  Douglas  Jacobsen 2012–Present. All trademarks, performances, databases & branding are owned by their rights holders; no use without permission. Unauthorized copying, modification, framing or public communication is prohibited. External links are not endorsed. Cookies & tracking require consent, and data processing complies with PIPEDA & GDPR; no data from children < 13 (COPPA). Content meets WCAG 2.1 AA under the Accessible Canada Act & is preserved in open archival formats with backups. Excerpts & links require full credit & hyperlink; limited quoting under fair-dealing & fair-use. All content is informational; no liability for errors or omissions: Feedback welcome, and verified errors corrected promptly. For permissions or DMCA notices, email: scott.jacobsen2025@gmail.com. Site use is governed by BC laws; content is “as‑is,” liability limited, users indemnify us; moral, performers’ & database sui generis rights reserved.