Ask A Genius 1223: The Reasoning System Test 3

Author(s): Rick Rosner and Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Publication (Outlet/Website): Ask A Genius

Publication Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2024/12/23

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: This is the reasoning system test brief.

Rick Rosner: All right, here’s my question. Let me know when you’re ready. Hey, ChatGPT, humans haven’t been acquitting themselves so well lately. How likely is it that future AI will assess itself as better able to make decisions about humans than humans?

Jacobsen: That’s the question.

Rosner: That’s the question. How likely is it that AI will evaluate humans and determine that AI’s decision-making capabilities are superior to humans?

Jacobsen: Keep it to 250 words. All right, here we go:

The possibility that future AI systems will make decisions about humans more effectively than humans themselves hinges on several factors. Advances in AI, particularly in areas like data analysis, pattern recognition, and predictive modelling, suggest that AI could process vast amounts of information more efficiently than humans. This capability might enable AI to identify trends, optimize resources, and implement policies with greater precision and consistency.

However, decision-making about humans involves both data and ethical, cultural, and emotional considerations. Human judgment incorporates empathy, moral values, and a nuanced understanding of societal contexts, which are areas where AI currently lacks depth. While AI can be programmed to follow ethical guidelines, interpreting and applying those in real-world situations remains challenging.

Moreover, developing and deploying AI decision-making systems require robust frameworks to ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness. Bias in training data, unintended consequences, and the potential for misuse are significant concerns that must be addressed to build trust in AI-driven decisions.

The likelihood of AI surpassing human decision-making in areas about humans depends on how these challenges are managed. Collaborative approaches, where AI augments rather than replaces human judgment, are often seen as a balanced path for ensuring that AI systems are designed with ethical considerations and oversight. This can enhance their effectiveness while maintaining the essential human elements of decision-making.

In summary, while AI has the potential to assist and improve certain decision-making processes, it is unlikely to replace the nuanced and value-driven judgments that humans provide fully. The future will likely involve a synergy between AI capabilities and human insight to make more informed and balanced decisions.

Rosner: All right, follow-up question. Let’s talk about the synergy between humans and AI. How likely is it that centaurs—humans closely integrated with AI—will come to dominate in numerous areas of human enterprise?

Jacobsen: Here:

The concept of centaurs, where humans are intimately linked with AI, represents a promising model for future collaboration across various sectors. This synergy leverages the strengths of both humans and AI, potentially leading to enhanced performance and innovation in numerous areas of human enterprise. AI technologies are increasingly integrated into daily workflows as powerful tools augmenting human capabilities.

In fields like healthcare, AI assists doctors in diagnosing diseases with greater accuracy by analyzing medical images and patient data. In finance, AI-driven algorithms optimize trade strategies and risk management. At the same time, AI generates art, music, and content in creative industries. Some advantages of human-AI synergy include enhanced decision-making, increased efficiency, and greater innovation and creativity.

Some challenges that need to be overcome are trust and reliability, ethical considerations, and skill development. Looking into the future, the likelihood of centaurs dominating various enterprises is high, driven by continuous advancements in AI and a growing recognition of the benefits of human-AI collaboration. Success will depend on addressing the associated challenges through robust frameworks, education, and ethical guidelines.

As these partnerships evolve, they are poised to transform industries by combining human intuition and creativity with AI’s computational prowess. In conclusion, the centaur model holds significant potential to revolutionize human enterprise, fostering a collaborative environment where humans and AI contribute their unique strengths to achieve superior outcomes.

Rosner: All right, one more question for ChatGPT. So, Ray Kurzweil, the father of the term singularity, contends that the singularity—where machine intelligence will become capable of answering just about any question posed by humans—will occur sometime in the 2040s. Given your training and the rate at which AI is growing more powerful, do you think this estimate is optimistic, pessimistic, or just about right?

Jacobsen: Here:
Ray Kurzweil’s prediction that a singularity will occur in the 2040s can be seen as cautiously optimistic. AI has made remarkable strides in natural language processing, machine learning, and data analysis, suggesting rapid advancement. However, achieving machine intelligence capable of answering any human question involves overcoming significant challenges, including understanding context, emotions, and ethical reasoning.

Additionally, breakthroughs in areas like general AI, which mimics human cognitive abilities, are still uncertain and may require more time than anticipated. Ethical considerations, regulatory frameworks, and societal acceptance also play crucial roles in shaping this timeline. While the exponential growth of AI technology supports Kurzweil’s optimistic view, the complexities involved make the 2040s estimate ambitious.

It is plausible but contingent on continued breakthroughs in responsible development, balancing optimism with recognizing substantial hurdles.

Rosner: Okay, all right. I’ve got one last one. Is the world moving towards an economy that isn’t based on capitalism or communism but rather on information processing?

And will this changeover happen within the next 70 years?

Jacobsen: Seventy?

Rosner: Yes, seventy.

Jacobsen: Here:

The world is increasingly embracing an information-based economy characterized by the centrality of data, digital technologies, and knowledge-driven industries. However, this shift does not necessarily signify a complete departure from traditional economic systems like capitalism and communism. Instead, it often represents an evolution or hybridization where information processing enhances existing frameworks.

Current trends include digital transformation, the knowledge economy, and platform economies. Companies like Google, Amazon, and Facebook exemplify this shift. Potential evolutions involve hybrid systems blending capitalism with enhanced information processing, fostering more efficient markets, personalized services, and decentralized decision-making through technologies like blockchain.

These systems could also include post-capitalist elements such as automation and AI, which reduce the need for traditional labour, as well as the exploration of universal basic incomes or more collaborative ownership models. The global economy will become more information-centred within the next 70 years. Technological advancements, societal adaptation, and policy developments will drive this change.

However, a complete departure from capitalism and communism is unlikely. Instead, expect a nuanced evolution where information processing becomes a cornerstone that enhances and reshapes existing economic structures rather than replacing them entirely. In summary, the economy is moving towards a more information-driven model, integrating deeply with current systems. This transformation will likely unfold over the next seven decades, resulting in a sophisticated hybrid economy that leverages information processing while retaining elements of traditional economic frameworks.

Rosner: All right, so a little bit bullshitty. All right, one last question—sorry, one last question- is: as technology, including AI, displaces more and more human labour, will humans’ place in the economy become increasingly relegated to the role of consumers?

Jacobsen: Here:

As AI and technology increasingly automate tasks, humans’ role in the economy is poised to evolve significantly. While traditional labour roles may diminish, relegating humans solely to consumers is oversimplified. Instead, several potential shifts could redefine human economic participation.

The rise of creative and emotional roles requiring emotional intelligence and complex decision-making, such as artists, therapists, and strategic leaders, will remain critical. Innovation and entrepreneurship can leverage AI as a tool rather than a replacement. Additionally, expanding the gig and flexible economy, with freelancing or remote work and platform-based opportunities, could facilitate new kinds of work through digital platforms and AI, connecting people in niche markets and specialized tasks.

Universal basic income or welfare models could emerge as reductions in traditional jobs necessitate policies to provide financial stability. These policies enable individuals to pursue education, creativity, and personal development without economic pressure. Lifelong learning and reskilling will also be crucial in helping humans adapt to new roles that emerge alongside technological advances.

Moreover, enhanced leisure and personal development could improve the quality of life. Fewer time constraints from work would allow individuals to dedicate more time to hobbies, volunteering, and community-building activities. Humans are unlikely to be confined merely to consumer roles. Instead, the economy will likely transition toward a diversified structure where humans engage in creative, strategic, and self-fulfilling activities supported by robust economic and social frameworks.

This evolution balances technological efficiency and human-centric values, fostering a dynamic and inclusive economic landscape.

Rosner: All right. So let me do a “yeah, but” to that one. Yeah, but ChatGPT, in the U.S., per capita productivity has increased more than five-fold since World War II. Yet, the middle class has not become more comfortable and must work hard. Do you think—well, I know you don’t think because you’re an AI—but do you think the benefits of tech and AI will eventually lead to lives of greater ease for humans, or will the middle class continue to get exploited?

Jacobsen: Here:

Your observation highlights a critical issue. Despite significant technological advancements since World War II, many middle-class individuals face persistent economic pressures and limited improvements in their quality of life. Economicand income inequality often stem from wealth concentration and wage stagnation.

Rising housing, education, and healthcare costs erode financial gains from higher productivity. Inflation frequently outpaces wage growth, making everyday life more difficult financially despite higher productivity. Additionally, job displacement caused by automation and changes in work contribute to job insecurity and create a need for reskilling.

While the gig economy provides flexibility for some, it often lacks the stability and benefits of traditional employment. However, there is potential for significant improvement in people’s lives through technological advancements. Enhanced efficiency and automation can reduce workloads and improve services. Emerging industries and entrepreneurship can create new economic opportunities. Universal basic income (UBI) and strengthened social safety nets could enhance financial security. At the same time, reskilling programs can prepare workers for new roles.

Flexible work arrangements and improved work-life balance could foster personal growth and reduce long hours. Policies and governance changes prioritizing fair distribution of AI-driven economic gains and ethical AI development could ensure societal benefits while preventing abuses.

In conclusion, while the current trajectory demonstrates that productivity gains do not consistently translate into improved well-being for the middle class, the future holds the potential for significant positive change. Achieving lives of greater ease through technology and AI will require deliberate actions, including equitable policymaking, investment in education and reskilling, and mechanisms to distribute technological benefits more fairly. If these measures are implemented successfully, technology and AI can lead to an enhanced quality of life, reduced work burdens, and broader economic prosperity for the middle class and beyond.

Rosner: All right. That’s enough of that.

Jacobsen: Let’s call it a night.

Rosner: I’m tired. All right. Thank you. I’ll talk to you tomorrow. Appreciate it.

Jacobsen: Thank you, too.

Last updated May  3, 2025. These terms govern all In Sight Publishing content—past, present, and future—and supersede any prior notices.  In Sight Publishing by Scott  Douglas  Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons BY‑NC‑ND 4.0; © In Sight Publishing by Scott  Douglas  Jacobsen 2012–Present. All trademarks, performances, databases & branding are owned by their rights holders; no use without permission. Unauthorized copying, modification, framing or public communication is prohibited. External links are not endorsed. Cookies & tracking require consent, and data processing complies with PIPEDA & GDPR; no data from children < 13 (COPPA). Content meets WCAG 2.1 AA under the Accessible Canada Act & is preserved in open archival formats with backups. Excerpts & links require full credit & hyperlink; limited quoting under fair-dealing & fair-use. All content is informational; no liability for errors or omissions: Feedback welcome, and verified errors corrected promptly. For permissions or DMCA notices, email: scott.jacobsen2025@gmail.com. Site use is governed by BC laws; content is “as‑is,” liability limited, users indemnify us; moral, performers’ & database sui generis rights reserved.