Publisher: In-Sight Publishing
Publisher Founding: March 1, 2014
Web Domain: http://www.in-sightpublishing.com
Location: Fort Langley, Township of Langley, British Columbia, Canada
Journal: In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal
Journal Founding: August 2, 2012
Frequency: Three (3) Times Per Year
Review Status: Non-Peer-Reviewed
Access: Electronic/Digital & Open Access
Fees: None (Free)
Volume Numbering: 12
Issue Numbering: 3
Section: B
Theme Type: Idea
Theme Premise: “Outliers and Outsiders”
Theme Part: 31
Formal Sub-Theme: None
Individual Publication Date: August 15, 2024
Issue Publication Date: September 1, 2024
Author(s): Jaime Alfonso Flores Navas
Word Count: 1,709
Image Credits: Aziz Acharki on Unsplash.
International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2369-6885
*Updated February 10, 2024.*
*Please see the footnotes, bibliography, and citations, after the publication.*
Keywords: 5-dimensional thinking and 4-dimensional thought, communication is about connecting deeply, healthy relationships should be 100+/100+, love cannot be defined, love is the most potent force, love is wise more than intelligent, soulmates share the same essence, true soulmates bond conceptually.
Love is the most potent force in the Universe
Love is the most potent force in the Universe
One of the reasons why love is impossible to define, even harder to define than other mundane concepts, to others, is that love knows reasons, reasons know nothing of. Here, we see 5-dimensional thinking to show that the later part of the statement is a 4-dimensional thought, and a slightly funny part is that I am explaining the reasons for it.
Love is largely about why, and non-linearly speaking, including how. It is funny. How to look at it and why it is so, which I love doing. Do not ask why.
Interestingly, love is harder and impossible to define than other larger concepts. Thus, we notice a rather important and underlying truth: Love is wise more than intelligent.
This also shows that metamessages are, sometimes, more extensive than the “original” theme/central idea. The gist goes beyond the basic idea. It is funny how it can be expressed in plain terms and as a self-evident truth.
Love, hence, cannot be defined as the most difficult concept. That would be an attribute which proves the original point. Being in love with love is rather superficial and dumb, but being in love with the idea of being unloved is even dumber, it is the opposite of love as logarithms are to powers. This proves the above point. Beyond judgement to bingo, what are we doing? Analyzing. To do such, we need to understand that showing love does not judge; it analyzes, yes, but it understands and understands better, proving love cannot be defined. This entails several more dimensions, showing that even if any system could be made from previous arguments, they would, indeed, help more to prove what is stated.
Knowing what one wants in a partner is essential; thus, with respect, the establishment of rules and considering the consequences of a healthy negotiation can benefit both parties.
To achieve this, it is essential and fundamental to not avoid idealizing one’s partner. That is love: to have a real experience, to know the partner well, and accept them as they are, to experience each other and grow together. It is thus important to highlight that fantasizing is the sweetest of all deaths being alive. When it comes to idealizing your partner, it is not love; it is to be in love with your idea about your partner, so our expectations are the most selfish and unrealistic like a castle in the clouds. However, in getting to know each other, in a harmonious way, by seeing how compatible each other are, learning from each other, growing with each other by also accepting the good and bad things, with honesty, knowing what one wants and most of all, knowing oneself, without these, there is nothing to be offered if we want a serious, healthy relationship.
When communication occurs, it is more about connecting than merely talking, so the entry communication takes on multiple levels and meanings.
It would be great to have a bond is beyond probability, which philosophers and mathematicians tend to have different positions on. It would be meant to be.
It would be essential:
To be compatible. The more similar we genuinely are, the better we are together with our match, to feel each other’s essence and they’re connected because we are the same soul in two bodies.
To experience love in such a special way with each other that it cannot be defined. It is what most defies human imagination. It is a fact: There is a fundamental attribute to being human by defining concepts.
This is linked to the fact that human imagination is conceptual. And we search for the truth. If love knows reasons that reason knows nothing of, then we partly know why love cannot be defined; that is a fact because love is truth. Thus, love cannot be defined; that is a fact because love is truth.
To feel our love goes beyond all possible forms of science, art, and any possible branch of human knowledge. Thanking God for making they couple for being together and for being in love. As a mathematician, I know: Mathematics make infinite sense, but love makes infinitely more sense (from an imagination that is defied by both, and this entailing transfinite numbers, categorizable infinities, love for mathematics as an under and upper scope, and of course love). We have a unique bond conceptually, spiritually, etc.
Interestingly, it is not so odd that it is neither true nor false that we cannot coin a quote on DIVINE LOVE for it to be the TRUTH. (Neither is it false nor is it true that it was me.)
Together, strengthening our bond is a should. Bravery and Fear are the most powerful weapons. They a
Interestingly, love is harder and impossible to define than other larger concepts. Thus, we notice a rather important and underlying truth: Love is wise more than intelligent.
This also shows that metamessages are, sometimes, more extensive than the “original” theme/central idea. The gist goes beyond the basic idea. It is funny how it can be expressed in plain terms and as a self-evident truth.
Love, hence, cannot be defined as the most difficult concept. That would be an attribute which proves the original point. Being in love with love is rather superficial and dumb, but being in love with the idea of being unloved is even dumber, it is the opposite of love as logarithms are to powers. This proves the above point. Beyond judgement to bingo, what are we doing? Analyzing. To do such, we need to understand that showing love does not judge; it analyzes, yes, but it understands and understands better, proving love cannot be defined. This entails several more dimensions, showing that even if any system could be made from previous arguments, they would, indeed, help more to prove what is stated.
Knowing what one wants in a partner is essential; thus, with respect, the establishment of rules and considering the consequences of a healthy negotiation can benefit both parties.
To achieve this, it is essential and fundamental to not avoid idealizing one’s partner. That is love: to have a real experience, to know the partner well, and accept them as they are, to experience each other and grow together. It is thus important to highlight that fantasizing is the sweetest of all deaths being alive. When it comes to idealizing your partner, it is not love; it is to be in love with your idea about your partner, so our expectations are the most selfish and unrealistic like a castle in the clouds. However, in getting to know each other, in a harmonious way, by seeing how compatible each other are, learning from each other, growing with each other by also accepting the good and bad things, with honesty, knowing what one wants and most of all, knowing oneself, without these, there is nothing to be offered if we want a serious, healthy relationship.
When communication occurs, it is more about connecting than merely talking, so the entry communication takes on multiple levels and meanings.
I have found and obtained such a healthy relationship with my true soulmate. We are married, in practice.
In our case–we are the loves of our lives and, more than that, real soulmates. Our bond is beyond probability, which philosophers and mathematicians tend to have different positions on. It is meant to be.
We are compatible. The more similar we genuinely are, the better we are together. We feel each other’s essence and are connected because we are the same soul in two bodies.
We have experienced love in such a special way with each other that it cannot be defined. It is what most defies human imagination. It is a fact: There is a fundamental attribute to being human by defining concepts.
This is linked to the fact that human imagination is conceptual. And we search for the truth. If love knows reasons that reason knows nothing of, then we partly know why love cannot be defined; that is a fact because love is truth. Thus, love cannot be defined; that is a fact because love is truth.
We feel our love goes beyond all possible forms of science, art, and any possible branch of human knowledge. We thank God for making us be together and for being in love. As a mathematician, I know: Mathematics make infinite sense, but love makes infinitely more sense (from an imagination that is defied by both, and this entailing transfinite numbers, categorizable infinities, love for mathematics as an under and upper scope, and of course love). We have a unique bond conceptually, spiritually, etc.
Interestingly, it is not so odd that it is neither true nor false that we cannot coin a quote on DIVINE LOVE for it to be the TRUTH. (Neither is it false nor is it true that it was me.)
Together, we strengthen our bond. Bravery and Fear are the most powerful weapons. They are on opposite sides of the same stick: Courage and fear, fear and aggression.
From this, we have a derived version: Love is the most powerful force that inspires bravery, and fear inspires the opposite, like yin and yang, making up for two components of the same coin. (I did not say anything about the middle part on purpose.)
This leads to a derived meta-message: I love the bravery of showing that all we should fear is fear itself from equilibrium.
This converges with one of my quotes to a certain extent: Metamessages can be twin-blade swords. This can indeed make it more powerful, especially considering that derived messages can be twin-blade swords.
Thus, a healthy relationship should be 100+/100+, not 50/50. 100+/100+ includes 0 by principle, not 1 percent. 100+/100+ in true soulmates is for Infinity; for true soulmates, love never dies.
We love Greek philosophy and the country as a whole. In a drawing I made of Socrates’s mind in 8 dimensions, I explained how he felt we were midwives in helping give birth to discoveries, as I did, but with my ideal partner, she and I should feel like that together, thus like a book she and I would understand in full together.
Bibliography
None
Footnotes
None
Citations
American Medical Association (AMA 11th Edition): Flores Navas JA, Love is the most potent force in the Universe. August 2024; 12(3). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/jaime
American Psychological Association (APA 7th Edition): Flores Navas, J. A., (2024, August 15). Love is the most potent force in the Universe. In-Sight Publishing, 12(3).
Brazilian National Standards (ABNT): FLORES NAVAS, J. A. Love is the most potent force in the Universe. In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, Fort Langley, v. 12, n. 3, 2024.
Chicago/Turabian, Author-Date (17th Edition): Flores Navas, Jaime Alfonso 2024. “Love is the most potent force in the Universe.” In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal 12, no. 3 (Summer). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/jaime.
Chicago/Turabian, Notes & Bibliography (17th Edition): Flores Navas, Jaime Alfonso “Love is the most potent force in the Universe.” In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal 12, no. 3 (August 2024). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/jaime.
Harvard: Flores Navas, J. A. (2024) ‘Love is the most potent force in the Universe’, In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, 12(3). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/jaime.
Harvard (Australian): Flores Navas, J A 2024, ‘Love is the most potent force in the Universe’, In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/jaime.
Modern Language Association (MLA, 9th Edition): Flores Navas, Jaime Alfonso “Love is the most potent force in the Universe.” In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, 2024, http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/jaime.
Vancouver/ICMJE: Flores Navas JA Love is the most potent force in the Universe [Internet]. 2024 Aug; 12(3). Available from: http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/jaime.
License & Copyright
In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. ©Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012-Present. Unauthorized use or duplication of material without express permission from Scott Douglas Jacobsen strictly prohibited, excerpts and links must use full credit to Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing with direction to the original content.
In-Sight Publishing 