Consent underlies religious and privacy rights: Our arguments for the BC Court of Appeal
Publisher: In-Sight Publishing
Publisher Founding: September 1, 2014
Publisher Location: Fort Langley, Township of Langley, British Columbia, Canada
Publication: Freethought Newswire
Original Link: https://www.bchumanist.ca/vabuoulas_bc_court_of_appeal
Publication Date: July 16, 2024
Organization: British Columbia Humanist Association
Organization Description: The British Columbia Humanist Association has been providing a community and voice for Humanists, atheists, agnostics, and the non-religious of Metro Vancouver and British Columbia since 1982. We support the growth of Humanist communities across BC, provide Humanist ceremonies, and campaign for progressive and secular values.
British Columbia’s privacy laws and the Charter’s protection of religious freedom are both fundamentally based on principles of consent and freedom from coercion, we argued in our submissions to the BC Court of Appeal yesterday.
The Court is considering an appeal of a BC Supreme Court decision earlier this year that required the Jehovah’s Witnesses congregations in Grand Forks and Coldstream to turn over records on two former members to the province’s privacy commissioner for review. The ex-congregants (the applicants) had requested their records under the province’s Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA). The Jehovah’s Witnesses argued disclosing some of these records would violate their freedom of religion. The BCHA intervened in the Supreme Court hearings arguing that such claims should be scrutinized carefully and that the court should consider the rights of the applicants too.
In our factum for the Court of Appeal, we argue that both religious freedom and the privacy rights set out in PIPA are founded upon principles of consent and autonomy; that individuals, not organizations, are the primary vessel for religious rights; and that in balancing rights, the court should consider the applicant’s religious freedom to dissociate.
As our lawyers, John Trueman and Chloe Trudel, conclude:
Like all Canadians, the records applicants undoubtedly enjoy the freedom to disassociate with organized religion — to withdraw their consent to participate in religious practices and to end their membership in a religious congregation. But that freedom is undermined if the records applicants are permanently tied to the appellants through secret files, the contents of which are withheld from them. This result would be the antithesis of “the absence of coercion or constraint” which section 2(a) of the Charter is supposed to guarantee.
Section 2(a) of the Charter ought not to become a sword by which religious organizations can exercise power over non-members, or former members, of their congregations through control over personal information. To do so would undermine the consent-based foundation of both religious freedom and privacy rights. It would expand the rights of religious organizations beyond what the Supreme Court of Canada has recognized to date. And it would subordinate the s. 2(a) claims of individuals who have exercised their right to leave organized religion to the claims of religious organizations.
The case is set to be heard in court on October 29, 2024.
Want to support our work? Become a member or make a donation.
License
In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Based on work at www.in-sightpublishing.com.
Copyright
© Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012-Present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Scott Douglas Jacobsen, or the author(s), and In-Sight Publishing with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. All interviewees and authors copyright their material, as well, and may disseminate for their independent purposes.
In-Sight Publishing 