We need to trust in science — even when the answers are complicated
Publisher: In-Sight Publishing
Publisher Founding: March 1, 2014
Web Domain: http://www.in-sightpublishing.com
Location: Fort Langley, Township of Langley, British Columbia, Canada
Journal: In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal
Journal Founding: August 2, 2012
Frequency: Three (3) Times Per Year
Review Status: Non-Peer-Reviewed
Access: Electronic/Digital & Open Access
Fees: None (Free)
Volume Numbering: 12
Issue Numbering: 1
Section: B
Theme Type: Idea
Theme Premise: “Outliers and Outsiders”
Theme Part: 29
Formal Sub-Theme: None.
Individual Publication Date: October 15, 2023
Issue Publication Date: January 1, 2024
Author(s): James A. Haught
Author(s) Bio(s): James A. Haught, syndicated by PeaceVoice, was the longtime editor at the Charleston Gazette and had been the editor emeritus since 2015. He was thought to have been the first investigative reporter in West Virginia. He won two dozen national newswriting awards and was author of 12 books and 150 magazine essays. He was also a senior editor of Free Inquiry magazine and was writer-in-residence for the United Coalition of Reason. He died on Sunday, July 23, at the age of 91.
Word Count: 688
Image Credit: None
International Standard Serial Number (ISSN): 2369-6885
*Please see the footnotes, bibliography, and citations, after the publication.*
Keywords: complexity, God, James Haught, J.B.S. Haldane, science, Stephen Hawking, trust.
We need to trust in science — even when the answers are complicated
Long ago, I concluded that no reliable evidence supports gods, devils, heavens, hells, miracles, prophecies and other supernatural stuff of religion. Those magic claims simply arise from the human imagination, I assumed. Instead, I chose to trust the honest search of science to explain the ultimate mysteries of existence.Aye, there’s the rub. Answers by science are sometimes almost as baffling and logic-defying as the mumbo-jumbo of churches:
Multiple universes, for example. Or Einstein’s assertion that time slows and dimensions shorten as speed increases. Or the mysteries of “quantum weirdness,” with particles popping in and out of existence in pure vacuum. Or the seeming impossibility of pulsars, which gravity compresses into a solid mass of neutrons weighing 100 million tons per cubic centimeter. Or the astounding claim at the heart of the Big Bang theory — stating that all matter in a trillion galaxies originated from a proton-size dot exploding stupendously 13.8 billion years ago. Holy moly.
In his posthumous book, Stephen Hawking says the entire vast universe essentially burst from nothing, following laws of nature. The book, Brief Answers to the Big Questions, was compiled by colleagues and relatives from the physicist’s notes, materials and interviews just after his 2018 death. It reiterates his well-known atheism:
It’s my view that the simplest explanation is that there is no God. No one created the universe and no one directs our fate. This leads me to a profound realization: there is probably no heaven and afterlife either. I think belief in an afterlife is just wishful thinking. There is no reliable evidence for it, and it flies in the face of everything we know in science. I think that when we die we return to dust.
In a 2011 interview with The Guardian newspaper, Hawking said each human brain is like a computer, and it’s inevitable that some computers malfunction and die.
“There is no heaven or afterlife for broken-down computers,” he said. “That is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark.”
If no divine creator made the universe, what did? Blind laws of nature, he says:
Since we know that the universe was once very small — perhaps smaller than a proton — this means something quite remarkable. It means the universe itself, in all its mind-boggling vastness and complexity, could simply have popped into existence without violating the known laws of nature. From that moment on, vast amounts of energy were released as space itself expanded …
But, of course, the critical question is raised again: did God create the quantum laws that allowed the Big Bang to occur? In a nutshell, do we need a god to set it up so the Big Bang could bang? I have no desire to offend anyone of faith, but I think science has a more compelling explanation than a divine creator.
Another of my science heroes is atheist-genius J.B.S. Haldane, who hatched the theory that life began in a “primordial soup” of chemicals. He saw that some science discoveries are almost impossible to believe. In 1928, he told a London newspaper: “The universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose.”
When theologians hounded him about God’s creation, Haldane joked that the creator “must have had an inordinate fondness for beetles,” to make 400,000 different species. And Haldane spoofingly saluted Noah for finding pairs of all creatures to take on the ark, when there are numerous different species of birds just in India alone (where Haldane spent a good number of years).
As I said, findings by science can seem nearly as absurd as the miracle claims of religion — but there’s a crucial difference: Science is honest. Nothing is accepted by blind faith. Every claim is challenged, tested, double-tested and triple-tested until it fails or survives as true. Often, new evidence alters former conclusions.
Even though science findings show that reality is queerer than we can suppose, honest thinkers have little choice but to trust science as the only reliable search for believable answers.
This essay is adapted from a column that previously appeared at Daylight Atheism on Oct. 12, 2020.
Bibliography
None
Footnotes
None
Citations
American Medical Association (AMA 11th Edition): Haught J. We need to trust in science — even when the answers are complicated. October 2023; 12(1). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/trust-science
American Psychological Association (APA 7th Edition): Haught, J. (2023, October 15). We need to trust in science — even when the answers are complicated. In-Sight Publishing. 12(1).
Brazilian National Standards (ABNT): HAUGHT, J. We need to trust in science — even when the answers are complicated. In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, Fort Langley, v. 12, n. 1, 2023.
Chicago/Turabian, Author-Date (17th Edition): Haught, James. 2023. “We need to trust in science — even when the answers are complicated.” In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal 12, no. 1 (Winter). http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/trust-science.
Chicago/Turabian, Notes & Bibliography (17th Edition): Haught, J “We need to trust in science — even when the answers are complicated.” In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal 12, no. 1 (October 2023).http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/trust-science.
Harvard: Haught, J. (2023) ‘We need to trust in science — even when the answers are complicated’, In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, 12(1). <http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/trust-science>.
Harvard (Australian): Haught, J 2023, ‘We need to trust in science — even when the answers are complicated’, In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, <http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/endgame-israel>.
Modern Language Association (MLA, 9th Edition): Haught, James. “We need to trust in science — even when the answers are complicated.” In-Sight: Independent Interview-Based Journal, vo.12, no. 1, 2023, http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/trust-science.
Vancouver/ICMJE: James H. We need to trust in science — even when the answers are complicated [Internet]. 2023 Oct; 12(1). Available from: http://www.in-sightpublishing.com/trust-science.
License
In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Based on work at www.in-sightpublishing.com.
Copyright
© Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012-Present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Scott Douglas Jacobsen, or the author(s), and In-Sight Publishing with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. All interviewees and authors copyright their material, as well, and may disseminate for their independent purposes.
In-Sight Publishing 