Skip to content

Paragraph 83(h)-(k) of the Beijing Platform for Action. Chapter IV. B. Education and Training of Women

2022-04-24

Author(s): Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Publication (Outlet/Website): The Good Men Project

Publication Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2018/10/16

Strategic objective B.4.

Develop non-discriminatory education and training

Actions to be taken

83. By Governments, educational authorities and other educational and academic institutions:

h. Develop curricula and teaching materials and formulate and take positive measures to ensure women better access to and participation in technical and scientific areas, especially areas where they are not represented or are underrepresented;

i. Develop policies and programmes to encourage women to participate in all apprenticeship programmes;

j. Increase training in technical, managerial, agricultural extension and marketing areas for women in agriculture, fisheries, industry and business, arts and crafts, to increase income-generating opportunities, women’s participation in economic decision-making, in particular through women’s organizations at the grass-roots level, and their contribution to production, marketing, business, and science and technology;

k. Ensure access to quality education and training at all appropriate levels for adult women with little or no education, for women with disabilities and for documented migrant, refugee and displaced women to improve their work opportunities.

Beijing Declaration (1995)

The basis in the non-discrimination of women, or men for that matter, in education, is not only in the behaviour of the individual but also in the presentation of the information in the educational curricula, the materials used for the study.

This can be helpful with vocational and technical training. Also, this can be an area in which women’s livelihood can be improved in general. Take, for example, the recommendation of “better access to and participation in technical and scientific areas.”

What is the common recommendation now? We see the argument from unsuitability. The assertion of women as unfit for particular positions. Before, it was innate capacities, which fell by the wayside.

Then as this attenuated, denuded, and deleted as a notion, the incursion of the other explanation emerged. It is not an innate capacity but innate preferences. You can see this eroding too.

In general, it is a trend in the reduction of the viability of innate arguments about the capacity of women. Then the reduction to non-existent or general relevance over time of the assumptions about women and men.

The apprenticeship programs for various forms of trades can be encouraged with the inclusion of policies and programmes aimed at increasing more women participation in them.

Indeed, we can find the variety of encouragements for women to enter into arenas of the education, vocational, and professional spheres not seen for them or considered for them as such as massive scale.

It is this basis that is a sign for encouragement because it is work through documents such as this that created the basis for the modern equality movements for the sexes.

This comes with further repetition, as per several prior sections of the document, of the need for inclusion of the educational provisions – and encouragement – of women at several levels in addition to the professional access.

–One can find similar statements in other documents, conventions, declarations and so on, with the subsequent statements of equality or women’s rights:

License

In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.in-sightpublishing.com.

Copyright

© Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012-Present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. All interviewees and authors co-copyright their material and may disseminate for their independent purposes.

Leave a Comment

Leave a comment