Skip to content

Paragraph 59(e)-(g) of the Beijing Platform for Action. Chapter IV. A. Women and Poverty

2022-04-24

Author(s): Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Publication (Outlet/Website): The Good Men Project

Publication Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2018/09/29

Strategic objective A.1.

Review, adopt and maintain macroeconomic policies and development strategies that address the needs and efforts of women in poverty

Actions to be taken

59. By multilateral financial and development institutions, including the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and regional development institutions, and through bilateral development cooperation:

e. Ensure that structural adjustment programmes are designed to minimize their negative effects on vulnerable and disadvantaged groups and communities and to assure their positive effects on such groups and communities by preventing their marginalization in economic and social activities and devising measures to ensure that they gain access to and control over economic resources and economic and social activities; take actions to reduce inequality and economic disparity;

f. Review the impact of structural adjustment programmes on social development by means of gender-sensitive social impact assessments and other relevant methods, in order to develop policies to reduce their negative effects and improve their positive impact, ensuring that women do not bear a disproportionate burden of transition costs; complement adjustment lending with enhanced, targeted social development lending;

g. Create an enabling environment that allows women to build and maintain sustainable livelihoods.

Beijing Declaration (1995)

The larger international financial and development organizations or institutions are important for the development of the world’s economy. There is, in this sense, the important consideration of the inclusion of some of the most powerful brokers in the world in the assistance of getting developing societies into the category of the developed society; although, of course, Bill Gates made some light calls, recently, in a change to some of the terminology around developed/developing, first-world/third-world and so on.

In contradistinction to the implications of the prior periods, we see the need for the instantiation of structural adjustment programs but with an explicit emphasis on the “vulnerable and disadvantaged groups and communities,” which, as some of you may recall, was an important point of conversation in the prior sections because the implied conclusion was the women of the world in the worst circumstances were disproportionately negatively affected by the structural adjustment programmes simply because women, especially poor women of color in developing countries, were not in the plans for those adjustments.

The ability to ensure the positive developments without the disproportionately negative effects on women is incredibly important for the advancement of societies through the scales of known social development, especially with the emphasis on the plight of the poorest women in their societies. It is the giving of a chance for women to have some access to and control over their own social and economic resources within these societies.

Indeed, these can help reduce the levels of inequality and the degree of economic disparity. It is not a simple calculation of moving from here-to-there but also bearing in mind the ways in which the historical record shows ways in which to do it, equitably and with women in mind. The review of the prior impacts is important in order to improve on the past and carve a more positive future for women who have been negatively impacted by the structural adjustment programmes of that past generation right into much of the present – the so-called neoliberal period.

The disproportionate level of the costs are being born by women, and so not by most men by implication, which makes this structural-institutional and, thus, a part of what is sometimes termed the Patriarchy but can more simply be defined as an institutional bias against the poor who are most often women of color, but women generally. The next portions are ways in which to continue this work for the development of societies.

Especially as regards the reduction of the costs on women and the disproportionate bearing of the burden by women, this will involve something or sets of things approximating the environments that permit women to be able to “build and maintain sustainable livelihoods,” and as climate change and overpopulation are the main concerns regarding future sustainability of human ppopulations; this, therefore, makes the focus on environmental and modern energy consumption-production cycles and reproductive health rights, including abortion and family planning, crucial for not only the advancement and empowerment of women but also the future sustainability of the global ecosystem in any reasonable consideration with humans living decent lives.

–One can find similar statements in other documents, conventions, declarations and so on, with the subsequent statements of equality or women’s rights:

License

In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.in-sightpublishing.com.

Copyright

© Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012-Present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. All interviewees and authors co-copyright their material and may disseminate for their independent purposes.

Leave a Comment

Leave a comment