Skip to content

Beijing Platform for Action, Chapter II: Global Framework – Paragraph 28

2022-04-24

Author(s): Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Publication (Outlet/Website): The Good Men Project

Publication Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2018/09/13

28. Moreover, 10 years after the Nairobi Conference, equality between women and men has still not been achieved. On average, women represent a mere 10 per cent of all elected legislators world wide and in most national and international administrative structures, both public and private, they remain underrepresented. The United Nations is no exception. Fifty years after its creation, the United Nations is continuing to deny itself the benefits of women’s leadership by their underrepresentation at decision-making levels within the Secretariat and the specialized agencies.

Beijing Declaration (1995)

The Beijing Declaration emphasizes the equality of women with men in a number of domains, with some of the recent ones discussed around excessive military expenditures harming potential financing of social programs and the integral role of women in peace and security around the world.

Paragraph 28 speaks to the reflection of an important conference based on the development and implementation of solutions to gender inequality with a tone of lament: “equality between women and men has still not been achieved.” Of the elected legislators around the world, women only represent about 10 percent of them circa 1995 with, probably, some modest but insufficient movements forward to the furtherance of equality.

This representation, or relative lack thereof, can be seen in the “national and international administrative structures” too. Women remain underrepresented in a number of important domains through the countries of the world and their respective administrative positions. By the way, the intriguing aspect of the statement is the specification of not only public, as one would typically expect, but also private administrative structures. This remains both surprising and not surprising.

Without taking advantage of the other half of the human population, we leave ourselves without the possibility of a larger talent pool for committed leaders and the diverse forms of leadership everyone brings to the table, to be able to tackle some of the large problems facing us. It is extraordinarily important to tackle the issues of the day, now. We did not target them as vigorously in the 20th century.

We can do better. As emphasized by the document, and worth repeating verbatim: “the United Nations is continuing to deny itself the benefits of women’s leadership by their underrepresentation at decision-making levels within the Secretariat and the specialized agencies.” The basic premise of gender equality amounts to an expansion of the Golden Rule into the area of sex and gender. Women deserve better treatment.

Indeed, and based on the preponderance of the evidence, more equality of the sexes in the society comes with a number of aforementioned benefits. It is, in this sense, that the questions remain around the means by which to optimize on the human capital options here; rather than, the explicit denial of the evidence and then selectively quoting evidence to try to disprove the mountain of evidence – as if calling a pebble a mountain.

This is the situation with denialism. We have less time and urgent needs based on the convergence of a number of problems in global society. The questions remain about the better and worse ways in which to bring about the fairer and more just society. One means is some of the suggestions in these international rights documents, and the associated conventions, declarations, and so on.

To bury our heads in the sand and deny ourselves of this great opportunity to capitalize on the other have of the human species seems both a travesty and a crime, the denial of the evidence as a sign of ignorance or insanity, and the criminal act in knowing one path can do far better for a set of peoples – most of us – and then choosing to reject it, which would harm the possible livelihoods of others in the future. It is not only the smart thing to do but also the right thing to do; so, we should get to it, and do it.

–One can find similar statements in other documents, conventions, declarations and so on, with the subsequent statements of equality or women’s rights:

License

In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.in-sightpublishing.com.

Copyright

© Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012-Present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. All interviewees and authors co-copyright their material and may disseminate for their independent purposes.

Leave a Comment

Leave a comment