Skip to content

Beijing Platform for Action, Chapter II: Global Framework – Paragraph 15

2022-04-23

Author(s): Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Publication (Outlet/Website): The Good Men Project

Publication Date (yyyy/mm/dd): 2018/09/06

15. A world-wide movement towards democratization has opened up the political process in many nations, but the popular participation of women in key decision-making as full and equal partners with men, particularly in politics, has not yet been achieved. South Africa’s policy of institutionalized racism – apartheid – has been dismantled and a peaceful and democratic transfer of power has occurred. In Central and Eastern Europe the transition to parliamentary democracy has been rapid and has given rise to a variety of experiences, depending on the specific circumstances of each country. While the transition has been mostly peaceful, in some countries this process has been hindered by armed conflict that has resulted in grave violations of human rights.

Beijing Declaration (1995)

The global move towards more and more democratization may have been more clear in the past than in the present. Indeed, we appear to have more open societies and democracies than at any prior point in history. However, with some of the recent, conscious, chaos created in the wake the American 2016 presidential election, the Brexit vote, and so on, there have been fundamental challenges or at least relatively basic ones to the structures of democracy with the society – or the democratic organizational processes of nations.

This raises issues about the basic premise in this paragraph, about the long-term viability of democracies. Nonetheless, if we assume the premise of an optimistic future circa 1995, we can note the increased political processing opening of several nations in addition to the participation of women within the levers of decision-making power of our societies. These are tremendously hopeful and heartwarming developments in our societies.

They continue to demarcate the modern period in contrast to the past where women did not even have the right to vote, as far as I know, in any nation only two centuries ago, even, potentially, a century and a half ago. These make the strides in democratization real and palpable. The questions, in the present, may be the extent to which these may undergo a temporary reversal; the environment of 1995 would propose the ways in which these can be expanded, to further respect the rights of persons and the human rights of women in particular given the context of this series.

In the representation of the South African case, slowly dwindling in our societal memory banks, there was an institutionalized racism known as apartheid that was dismantled and then a democratic revolution began to sweep through the nation. This is something extended into the note of Central and Eastern European nations developing parliamentary democracies.

These were seeing “rapid” rises depending on the domain in question and the specific country to be considered. Nonetheless, most of the nations rose into formal democratic statuses, apparently, more or less peacefully while some were and remained in conflict in the process, which coincided with “grave violations of human rights.” Not a small detail but not the glaring issue if taken in a larger geographic and historical contexts, even now, we see more and more democracies or democratization and peaceful transition to them and peace amongst and between them.

–One can find similar statements in other documents, conventions, declarations and so on, with the subsequent statements of equality or women’s rights:

License

In-Sight Publishing by Scott Douglas Jacobsen is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Based on a work at www.in-sightpublishing.com.

Copyright

© Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing 2012-Present. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Scott Douglas Jacobsen and In-Sight Publishing with appropriate and specific direction to the original content. All interviewees and authors co-copyright their material and may disseminate for their independent purposes.

Leave a Comment

Leave a comment